|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of TCP/IP and Peer Services
By: Walter Metcalf
Date: 02/02/00
Page 1, 2
- Peer Services
- Capabilities
- Communications among workstations in relatively close proximity (i.e. on a LAN).
- LAN is an acronym for Local Area Network. Although the term "Local" varies by manufacturer,
remember that nearly all workstations in a LAN are connected by cable, so you are obviously
not going to have the computers across the city or country from each other! Practically
speaking, all computers in a LAN are usually in the same office suite or home.
- All workstations are of equal rank. That means no computer is dedicated to serving
the others. Such a computer would be called a server, and its presence would violate the
definition of a peer network.
- Peer Services uses normal OS/2 techniques to access remote resources.
- Peer Services installs below the File Management layers of OS/2, so that, unlike
TCP/IP, accesses to other (i.e. remote) workstations are carried out by using the ordinary
device and path techniques used everywhere else by OS/2. Access to remote directories, for
example, is achieved by assigning them device names that are undefined on the local workstation.
Once the assignment is made, everything that can be performed with a normal pathname/filename
can be performed on the remote workstation.
- As an example of the kind of power this puts at your disposal, with this type of LAN it is as
easy to automatically back up all the disk drives on the entire LAN from one computer as it is
to back up of the drives of one computer. Trying to do this using only TCP/IP would be, at best,
very difficult.
- Disadvantages
- Restrictive
- Probably the biggest drawback to Peer Services is that you are completely cut-off from other
computers, notably those on the Internet. You have wonderful access to computers on your
LAN, but no access to anything else.
- High Management
- This could be a subjective reaction but it seems to me that Peer Services is somewhat fussy,
and is what we might call a "high management" component, at least when compared with
TCP/IP services. I'm sure there are others who feel differently.
- The Combined LAN - The best of both worlds.
This is essentially the reason I've installed both Peer Services and TCP/IP in the LAN I'm configuring in
this series of articles--and why I've built my LAN at home the same way. In this way each workstation has
the superb file/directory access to the other stations, and each workstation also has full and complete
access to the Internet. If you are fortunate enough to have high-speed internet access such as xDSL or
internet on cable, each of your workstations can have full access to its capabilities. Moreover each
workstation will have the benefit of any firewall protection you build into the machine connected to the
modem. (You have added a firewall, haven't you?)
Walter Metcalf
Next week: First Look at SmartSuite 1-2-3 for OS/2 v1.5
Unless otherwise noted, all content on this site is Copyright © 2004, VOICE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|